NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Glenn Andrew LUSCOMBE [2008] NSWDC 393
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 December 2008
JURISDICTION: District Court of New South Wales
JUDGMENT OF: Cogswell SC DCJ
DECISION: For the first offence - fixed term of 6 months imprisonment. For the second offence - non-parole period of 5 months, balance of the term of 7 months.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - possess child pornography - plea of guilty at earliest opportunity - images and videos of child pornography on offender's computer - level 3 to level 7 on the COPINE scale - criteria in R v Gent - offences at lower end of the range of objective seriousness - limited insight - need for general deterrence - special circumstances warranting adjustment of usual ratio between non-parole and parole period
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 s 91H(3) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 50
R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370 CASES CITED: R v Saddler [2008] NSWDC 48 R v Stroempl (1995) 105 CCC (3rd ed.) 187
PARTIES: Regina Glenn Andrew Luscombe
FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/13161
SOLICITORS: Mr Jilek for the Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Leary for the offender
JUDGMENT
1. Glenn Andrew Luscombe has been described as an immature man who has a sexual preoccupation with underage girls. He has confessed to two offences of possessing child pornography. It is my job now to sentence him for those two offences.
2. Today he pleaded guilty to the two charges. The first is that between 1 January 2006 and 18 August 2006 he had child pornography in his possession. He had 4,800 images and six video clips. The second charge is that between 1 July 2006 and 5 December 2006 he had child pornography in his possession, namely, eight images and five video clips. They are both offences against s 91H(3) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty is five years imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate