NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Allen v Lloyd-Jones (No. 2) [2010] NSWDC 41
HEARING DATE(S): 12 March 2010; 15 March 2010 (plaintiff's written submissions); 19 March 2010 (defendant's written submissions)
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 March 2010
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Gibson DCJ
(1) The defendant is to provide further and better answers to interrogatories 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, with verification, by Monday 29 March at 5:00 pm. DECISION: (2) The defendant may serve the interrogatories by fax or email in order to comply with the time frame in order 1. (3) Order 1 is self-executing in nature. (4) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of this application.
CATCHWORDS: TORT - defamation - further and better answers to interrogatories
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 LEGISLATION CITED: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 22.1(1)
AON Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; (2009) 258 ALR 14; (2009) 83 ALJR 951; [2009] HCA 27 Aspar Autobahn v Dovala Pty Ltd & Ors (1987) 74 ALR 550 Bennette v Cohen [2009] NSWCA 60 Bryson v Casey [2002] NSWSC 636 CASES CITED: Cayron v Crevelli (1896) 18 ALT 83 Cotter v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 587 Mallick v McGeown [2008] NSWSC 129 Thiess v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No. 3) [1992] 1 Qd R 587 W A Pines Pty Ltd v Bannerman (1980) 30 ALR 559 Zaetta v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 508
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate