NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Peng v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 295 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the decision for a list of the amendments.
DIVISION: Revenue Division
APPLICANTS Zhong Cheng Peng and Zhi Peng PARTIES: RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 076108 and 086110
HEARING DATES: 12 October 2009 and 13 November 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 13 November 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 30 November 2009
BEFORE: Block J - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Award of costs – indemnity costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622, 624 Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Limited (1993) 44 FCR 194 Neat Holdings Pty Limited v Karajan Holdings Pty Limited (1992) 67 ALJR 170 Residents against Improper Development Incorporated and Another v Chase Property Investments Pty Ltd (2006) 149 LGERA 360 Vero Insurance Ltd v The Gombac Group Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 117 CASES CITED: Yates v Bola [2000] FCA 1895 Colgate Palmolive v Cusson (1993) 46 FCR 225 Lee v Mavaddat 2005 WASC 68 Gribbles Pathology Pty Ltd v Health Insurance Commission [1997] 80 FCR 283 CIC Insurance Limited v Bankstown Football Club Limited (1997) 187 CLR 38 Kyriacou v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 175 IRG Technical Services Pty Ltd v FCT (2007) 156 FCR 57
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate