NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Seary v White (No 4) [2008] NSWDC 20 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 June, 23, 24 August, and 14, 15, 16 November 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 February 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil Jurisdiction
JUDGMENT OF: Johnstone DCJ at 1
DECISION: Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $569,912.00
CATCHWORDS: DAMAGES - whether the plaintiff sustained any significant cognitive deficits that result from an irreversible traumatic brain injury caused by a motor accident - conflicting neurological evidence - conflicting psychological evidence as to the results of psychometric testing - MAS certificates not probative of causation - consideration of the nature, effect and duration of a psychological condition caused by the motor accident - economic loss - no direct evidence of probable earnings - evaluation of the worth of a loss of capacity to earn
LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999: s 128, s 131
Graham v Baker [1961] HCA 48; (1961) 106 CLR 340 at 347 Ivkovic v Australian Iron & Steel Ltd [1963] SR (NSW) 598 at 607 Jones v Schiffman [1971] HCA 52 Linsell v Robson [1976] 1 NSWLR 249 at 259 CASES CITED: Mafra v Egan (No 1) (2006) NSWDC 22 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 20; (1990) 169 CLR 638 at 639 Paff v Speed [1961] HCA 14; (1961) 105 CLR 549 at 566 Pham v Shui [2006] NSWCA 373 at [90] Qantas Airways Ltd v Lisica [2007] NSWCA 371 State of NSW v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133 at [71]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate