NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Gary GOW [2006] NSWDC 78
HEARING DATE(S): 07/08/2006 - 14/08/2006 20/10/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 October 2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/27/2006
JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ
DECISION: See paragraphs [31] & [32]
CATCHWORDS: Manslaughter - Doctor causes death of patient
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
PARTIES: Crown Gary Gow
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0791
COUNSEL: P. Adey (Crown) E. Fullerton SC (Offender)
SOLICITORS: DPP Hughes and Taylor Solicitors
SENTENCE 1 On 7 August 2006 Dr Gow was indicted on one count of manslaughter. He pleaded not guilty to that offence and a jury was empanelled. The Crown called its evidence and Dr Gow gave evidence on his own behalf. However at the completion of his evidence he changed his plea to one of guilty. He now stands to be sentenced for the manslaughter of one of his patients, Mr Wayne Ritchie.
2 Mr Ritchie suffered from a number of ailments including chronic back pain. He was being treated by a Dr McKay but when Dr McKay refused to prescribe morphine he went to Dr Gow. He first saw Dr Gow on 24 August 2004.
3 Dr Gow is a GP who also practices homeopathy. When Mr Ritchie first saw Dr Gow he asked for morphine, as he had Dr Mackay, but Dr Gow also refused to prescribe that drug to him. Instead he spent a lengthy period of time taking a history from Mr Ritchie and ultimately suggested that he try some homeopathic remedies. Mr Ritchie agreed. Mr Ritchie returned for a further consultation to discuss his treatment and then came back once more on 22nd 4 September 2004. On that day Dr Gow prescribed morphine for Mr Ritchie. It was the taking of that drug which killed Mr Ritchie.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate