NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Kalim v Universities Admissions Centre (NSW & ACT) Pty Ltd [2010] NSWADT 277
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Neshat Kalim PARTIES: RESPONDENT Universities Admissions Centre (NSW & ACT) Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER: 081108; 091052; 091033
HEARING DATES: 4 June 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 15 June 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 22 November 2010
BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President)
CATCHWORDS: COSTS – prolonging unreasonably the time taken to complete the proceedings – vexatiously conducting the proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
Kalim v Universities Admission Centre (NSW Act) Pty Ltd [ 2008] NSWADT 135 Haas v Hosking (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 203 Attorney-General (Victoria) v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 CASES CITED: Re Williams and Australian Electoral Commission [1995] AATA 160; (1995) 21 AAR 467 Margan v University of Technology, Sydney [2003] NSWADTAP 65 Wilde v University of Sydney [2004] NSWADTAP 32 Miriani v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2005] NSWADT 99 Rae v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (No 3) [2010] NSWADT 254
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT K Edwards, counsel
ORDERS: The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs as agreed, or if not agreed, as assessed under the Legal Profession Act 2004.
REASONS FOR DECISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate