NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Haas v Hosking (No 2) [2010] NSWADT 203
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Peter Haas PARTIES: RESPONDENT Phillip Hosking
FILE NUMBER: 081088
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 21 May 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 16 August 2010
BEFORE: Perrignon R - Judicial Member; Kelleghan D - Non-Judicial Member; Monaghan-Nagle L - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Costs - complaint of racial vilification - whether proceedings conducted vexatiously - whether failure to comply with Tribunal's directions - whether proceedings unreasonably prolonged - special considerations applying to proceedings in Equal Opportunity Division
LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
AT v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 131 CASES CITED: MT v AA (no 2) EOD [2010] NSWADTAP 28 Murtough v NSW Bar Association [2008] NSWADT 166 Tu v University of Sydney (No. 2) [2002] NSWADTAP 25
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT A Connolly, barrister
ORDERS: The Respondent's application for costs is dismissed
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 On 11 February 2010, the Tribunal dismissed a complaint of racial discrimination by Mr Haas against Mr Hosking. The proceedings were heard over a period of four days from 11 February 2009 to 6 July 2009. Mr Hosking seeks an order for his costs of the proceedings, or such of those costs as the Tribunal considers fair.
Complaint and findings 2 On 28 April 2008, Mr Haas had complained to the Anti-Discrimination Board that, on 1 November 2007, Mr Hosking had attended Mr Haas' property at Moama and racially vilified him, by saying 'that he was not going to have fucking Jews build anything near him', or 'that he was not going to let fucking Jews build a shed near him'.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate