NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Peterson v South Eastern Sydney Illawarra Area Health Service & Elliott [2010] NSWDC 114
HEARING DATE(S): 11, 12, 13, 14, 22 May, 1 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 June 2010
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Levy SC DCJ
1. Verdict and judgment for the defendants; DECISION: 2. Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered; 3. The exhibits may be returned; 4. Liberty to apply on 7 days notice if further orders are required.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS – professional negligence – medical – orthopaedic out-patient management of complex Type 3 Pilon tibial fracture following initial operative repair – whether unreasonable delay in arranging further orthopaedic surgery for non-union or delayed union of fracture – whether breach of duty of care by hospital – whether breach of duty of care by consultant visiting medical officer – whether defendants proved cigarette smoking by plaintiff constituted contributory negligence – whether legal test for causation of harm satisfied – considerations of Civil Liability Act 2002, s 5O - s 5E - DAMAGES – assessment of multiple heads of damage
Civil Liability Act 2002 LEGISLATION CITED: District Court Act 1973 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Forst [1940] HCA 45; (1940) 64 CLR 538 Chappell v Hart [1998] HCA 55; 195 CLR 232 Daw v Toyworld (NSW) Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 25 Dobler v Halvorsen [2004] NSWCA 391 Erwin v Iveco Trucks Australia Ltd [2010] NSWCA 113 Evans v Lindsay [2006] NSWCA 354 Gett v Tabet [2009] NSWCA 76 Halvorsen v Dobler [2006] NSWSC 1307 Joslyn v Berryman [2003] HCA 34; (2003) 214 CLR 552 Luxton v Vines [1952] HCA 19; (1952) 85 CLR 352 CASES CITED: Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Pennington v Norris [1956] HCA 26; (1956) 96 CLR 10 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34 Purkess v Crittenden [1965] HCA 34; (1965) 114 CLR 164 Roads and Traffic Authority (NSW) v Refrigerated Roadways Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 263 Rogers v Whitaker [1992] HCA 58; (1992) 175 CLR 479 Rosenberg v Percival [2001] HCA 18; 205 CLR 434 Sretenovic v Reed [2009] NSWCA 280 Strinic v Singh [2009] NSWCA 15 Tabet v Gett [2010] HCA 12 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; (2005) 223 CLR 442 Watts v Rake [1960] HCA 58; (1960) 108 CLR 158
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate