NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Innes [2008] NSWDC 260 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 15-18 April; 21 April 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 October 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Knox SC DCJ
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentence - Break and enter - Larceny - Damage - Public facility - Hospital - Automatic teller machine - ATM - Ram raid - Persons present - DNA - Admissions - Premeditation - Drug abuse - Alcohol abuse
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
R v Guthrie [2002] NSWCCA 77 R v Morris [2008] NSWCCA 115 CASES CITED: R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] 164 CLR 465 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383
PARTIES: Regina Brian Innes
FILE NUMBER(S): 07/21/3110
COUNSEL: Crown: Mr Williams Defence: Mr Stewart
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: On 21 April, 2008, the offender was convicted by a jury following a trial in the District Court at Campbelltown on the following count:
2 On 6 September 2005 at Campbelltown in the state of New South Wales, being in the company of other persons, did break and enter a building, namely the Campbelltown Hospital, the property of the Sydney South West Area Health Service at Therry Road, Campbelltown, with intent to commit a serious indictable offence inside those premises, namely larceny.
3 The maximum penalty for that offence pursuant to s 113(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 is fourteen years imprisonment.
Facts
4 In terms of the facts, consistently with the verdict of the jury I find the following facts to have been established on the evidence given in the trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate