NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Makeig v Tucun [2009] NSWDC 208
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 May 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court of New South Wales
JUDGMENT OF: Cogswell SC DCJ
DECISION: Verdict and judgment for the defendants.
CATCHWORDS: CIVIL LAW - judgment - contract - promissory estoppel - quantum meruit
LEGISLATION CITED: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 R 42.15
Brenner v First Artists Management Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 221 CASES CITED: Franks v Equitiloan Securities Pty Limited [2008] NSWSC 33 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2008) 232 CLR 635 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387
TEXTS CITED: Restitution and Quasi-Contract
Peter Makeig PARTIES: Tugomir Tucun Stephanie Tucun Stephanie Tucun
FILE NUMBER(S): 5357/07
JUDGMENT
1. Mr and Mrs Tucun owned a house in Gordon. One day Mr Makeig did a leaflet drop in their street. It was about owners developing their properties in conjunction with Mr Makeig. Mr Makeig and Mr and Mrs Tucun had discussions about the Tucuns' property. The discussions lasted for some months and indeed years. They were accompanied by a good deal of correspondence, mostly from Mr Makeig to the Tucuns.
2. Mr Makeig arranged for two development applications for the Tucuns' property to be approved by the local council. Now Mr Makeig is suing the Tucuns. He says the legally binding arrangement from the start was that he would do the work on the development of the Tucuns' property in exchange for a fee. That fee would be thirty percent of the amount by which the Tucuns' property increased in value as a result of the development consent. He says the property increased in value by $425,000 so that the Tucuns owe him thirty per cent of that, namely $127,500 which is the amount of his claim in this case.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate