NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Richards -V- Corptel Pty Limited [1997] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: Ms Jaime Richards
RESPONDENT: Corptel Pty Limited
NUMBER: 64 of 1997
Mr D Bitel ( Judicial Member ) TRIBUNAL: Mrs R Cox Mr L Lau
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Sex (Sexual Harassment) and Victimisation
DATES OF HEARING: 10/09/1997 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/09/1997
Complainant: Mr T Goldburg Turner Freeman Solicitors Ms S Winters (Counsel) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr D Sisinni Yandells Lawyers
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF:
CHAIRPERSON: The Tribunal has considered the issues which have been raised in this complaint and proposes to hand down our decision now and to give reasons now as well.
Firstly, the decision. The Tribunal finds for the Complainant and finds substantiated the complaints that she was treated less favourably and subjected to detriment during the course of her employment, and that she was subjected to sexual harassment. The Tribunal also finds that she was subjected to victimisation.
In terms of the award, the Tribunal makes an order that the Respondent pay to the Complainant, within 28 days, an amount of $2,538.42 for lost wages, which was an amount which was agreed between the parties, and an amount of $5,000 by way of general damages. The Tribunal also makes an order for costs against the Respondent.
The reasons the Tribunal makes those orders are as follows: -
The Complainant was born on 26 June 1978, and commenced employment with the Respondent some time in the middle of 1995. She seems to have been a satisfactory employee, and evidence was given to the Tribunal from Mr O'Hare, the Managing Director of the Respondent, that she was a satisfactory employee, and that up until the events the subject of the complaint, they had no cause for concern with her conduct.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate