NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298
DIVISION: General Division
1st APPLICANT Michael Leech
PARTIES: 2nd APPLICANT Steve Yang Constructions Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT Sydney Water Corporation
FILE NUMBER: 103112
HEARING DATES: 6 October 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 6 October 2010
EXTEMPORE DECISION DATE: 6 October 2010 BEFORE: Montgomery S - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Freedom of Information Act - access to documents – business affairs
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Freedom of Information Act 1989
Colakovski v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1991) 29 FCR 429 Hynes v General Manager, Hawkesbury City Council [2004] NSWADT 135 CASES CITED: Neary v State Rail Authority [1999] NSW ADT 107 Robinson v Director General Department of Health [2002] NSWADT 222 Searle Australia Pty Ltd v PIAC (1992) 108 ALR 163
1st APPLICANT J Dawson, solicitor
REPRESENTATION: 2nd APPLICANT A Yang, agent
RESPONDENT J Mattson, solicitor
ORDERS: The matter is remitted for re-consideration by Sydney Water pursuant to section 63(3)(d) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 with the recommendation that documents be released in a redacted form. The information referred to at paragraph [23] of these reasons should be removed from the documents before they are released.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate