NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Budd v State of New South Wales (Attorney General's Department) [2009] NSWADT 215
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
Applicant: Pamela Budd PARTIES: Respondent: State of New South Wales (Attorney General's Department)
FILE NUMBER: 091026
HEARING DATES: 9 July 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 28 July 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2009
BEFORE: Kavanagh J
CATCHWORDS: Application for leave to appeal - s96 of Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 - complaint that Administrative Decisions Tribunal Registry staff discriminated against applicant - President of Anti-Discrimination Board determined complaint lacking in substance - consideration re leave to appeal - test applicable to leave application - leave refused
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
Budd v State of New South Wales (Attorney General's Department) [2008] NSWADT 239 City of Sydney Council v Satara [2007] NSWCA 148 CASES CITED: Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales and Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Salido v Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 State of Queensland & Anor v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Xu v Sydney West Area Health Service [2006] NSWADT 3
Applicant Representative: In person REPRESENTATION: Respondent Representative: Mr J. Cahill, solicitor
ORDERS: The application by Ms Budd for leave of the Tribunal to proceed with a complaint under s92(1) of the Act is refused and the application is dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate