NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Legal Services Commissioner v Bechara (No 3) [2009] NSWADT 313
DIVISION: Legal Services Division
APPLICANT Legal Services Commissioner PARTIES: RESPONDENT Maria Bechara
FILE NUMBER: 062023
HEARING DATES: 1 December 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 1 December 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 14 December 2009
BEFORE: Haylen W - J (Deputy President); Barnes M - Judicial Member; O'Neill A - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Professional misconduct - hearing regarding penalty - deliberate charging of grossly excessive costs - failure to apportion costs of joint hearing involving three clients - respondent practitioner consents to public reprimand and payment of applicant's costs - applicant seeks imposition of fine - factors place breach in lower end of range of fines - appropriate case in which to impose fine
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act¸ 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004, ss 566, 576(e), 577
Environment Protection Authority v Barnes [2006] NSWCCA 246 Legal Services Commissioner v Bechara [2009] NSWADT 145 CASES CITED: New South Wales Bar Association v Meakes [2006] NSWCA 340 Nikolaidis v Legal Services Commissioner [2007] NSWCA 130 Veghelyi v The Law Society of New South Wales (unreported, NSWCA, 6 October 1995)
APPLICANT L Muston, solicitor REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT P Doyle Gray, barrister
(1)The respondent practitioner, Ms Maria Bechara, is found guilty of professional misconduct ORDERS: (2)The respondent practitioner is publicly reprimanded (3)The respondent practitioner is fined the sum of $6,500.(4)The respondent practitioner is to pay the costs of the Legal Services Commissioner in a sum as agreed or, in the absence of agreement, as assessed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate