NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal :
CITATION: Dhillon v Rail Corporation of NSW [2009] NSWADT 96
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Anastasia Dhillon
FIRST RESPONDENT Rail Corporation NSW
SECOND RESPONDENT Tony Osmani
PARTIES: THIRD RESPONDENT Tony Sinikoski
FOURTH RESPONDENT Alfonso Mateo
FIFTH RESPONDENT Jose Mateo
SIXTH RESPONDENT Fady Younes
FILE NUMBER: 071111
HEARING DATES: 23 April 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 6 May 2009
BEFORE: Britton A - Deputy President
LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
New Zealand v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2006] NSWADT 126 CASES CITED: Trevor Gallagher v Aboriginal Hostels Ltd [2006] AIRC 298 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165
Applicant Representative P Thew, barrister REPRESENTATION: Respondent Representative Y Shariff, barrister
ORDERS: Application for interim orders is dismissed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 Ms Dhillon applies for an interim order under s 105 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) in the following terms: That RailCorp reinstate the special allowance paid to Ms Dhillon between August 2006 that was terminated on 15 Feb 2009. 2 RailCorp opposes this application.
3 At the hearing listed to determine this application, the parties advised that in principle, agreement had been reached about a second proposed order, which was set out in Ms Dhillon's submissions filed in the Tribunal on 15 April 2009.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate