NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Regina v Kim Loan Nguyen [2006] NSWDC 25
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Finnane QC DCJ
CATCHWORDS: Evidence - Admissibility - Expert Evidence - Opinion of experienced Police Operative - Meaning of codewords in telephone intercepts - Drugs
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s.79
Regina v Lam [2002] NSWCCA 377 Makita (Australia) P/L v Sprowles 52 NSWLR 705 Regina v Howard [2005] NSWCCA 25 Regina v Anderson [2000] VSCA 16 Paric v John Holland Constructions P/L 1984 2 NSWLR 505 R v Folwer (1985 ) 39 SASR 440 Holtman v Sampson [1985] 2 Qd R 472 Bell v FS & U Industrial Benefit Society Ltd (9 September 1987 unreported judgment) CASES CITED: Lewis v The Queen (1987) 88 FLR 104 R v Lucas [1992] 2 VR 109 Sydneywide Distributors Proprietary Limited v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd (2002) IPR 354 Cadbury Schweppes, v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Proprietary Limited [2006] FCA 363 Bugg v. Day (1949) 79 C.L.R. 442 R. v. Inch (1990) 91 Cr.App.R. 51 R. v. Marquard (1993) 85 C.C.C. 193 R. v. Turner [1975] 1 Q.B. 834 R. v. J. (No.1) (1994) A.Crim.R. 522 Regina versus Van Tan Huynh (Court of Criminal Appeal New South Wales unreported 13th of May 1996)
PARTIES: Regina Kim Loan Nguyen
FILE NUMBER(S): 05/11/0806
COUNSEL: Mr V Hrouda- Crown Mr P Faris Q.C. with Mr J Korn for the Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate