NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Pegios [2008] NSWDC 104 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 10,11,12,13, 16 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 June 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Murrell SC DCJ at 1
DECISION: See paragraph 26
CATCHWORDS: Manslaughter by gross negligence - dentist death of patient - no case submission - judge alone trial.
R v Misra [2004} EWCA Crim 2375 CASES CITED: R v Adomako [1995] 1AC 171 R v Bateman (1925) 19 CR App R 8
PARTIES: Department of Public Prosecution - Crown Dr G Pegios - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S): 07/11/0232
COUNSEL: Mr B Hughes - Crown Prosecutor Mr S Littlemore SC- Defendant
SOLICITORS: The Office of the Director of Publib Prosecution - Crown Guild Legal - Defendant
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
16 June 2008
Coram: Judge H G Murrell SC
R v Pegios
No. 07/11/0232
Decision on No Case Submission
1. On 8 November 2002, the accused, a dentist, performed a dental implant procedure upon Sabatini Catignani. During the procedure, the accused used sedation. Mr Catignani suffered a critical loss of blood oxygen saturation, and died of hypoxic brain damage. 2. The accused is being tried before me, sitting as a judge alone, on the charge that, on 8 November 2002 at Kogarah, he unlawfully killed the deceased (manslaughter).
3. The Crown says that the accused was grossly negligent in that:
(1) while subjecting the deceased to sedation in his surgery, the accused negligently administered excessive drugs, causing the deceased to lose consciousness or become deeply sedated, and thereby risking airway compromise and oxygen desaturation; and (2) the accused negligently failed to respond appropriately when the deceased experienced oxygen desaturation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate