NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Keller Civil Engineers Pty Limited v Toulena Pty Limited & Ors [2010] NSWDC 180
HEARING DATE(S): 27 July 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 August 2010
JURISDICTION: District Court - Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
1 The application to set aside the judgment is dismissed. 2 The stay of enforcement of the judgment granted on 15 July 2010 is dissolved. DECISION: 3 The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application. 4 Exhibits are returned. 5 My reasons are published.
CATCHWORDS: APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE ABSENCE OF THE DEFENDANTS - Claim on Deed of acknowledgment of Debt - Claimed irregularity in entry of judgment - Credit - Delay unexplained - Conduct inconsistent with claimed defence - Cross claim not defeated by Anshun - Principles to be applied
LEGISLATION CITED: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED: Jolati Pty Limited v Hobelo Pty Limited & Anor CA 82/1985, 9 August 1985, BC 8500622 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Limited (1981) 147 CLR 589 Satz v ACN 069 808 957 Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 365
Keller Civil Engineers Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES: Toulena Pty Limited (First Defendant) Marcel Dagher (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 2010/00099534
COUNSEL: Mr F P Hicks (For Plaintiff) Mr B Green (For the First and Second Defendants)
SOLICITORS: Moray & Agnew Lawyers (For Plaintiff) Navado Lawyers & Solicitors (For the First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate