NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Pegios [2008] NSWDC 105
HEARING DATE(S): 10,11,12,13, 16,17,18 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 June 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Murrell SC DCJ at 1
DECISION: See paragraph 69
CATCHWORDS: Manslaughter by gross negligence - dentist - death of patient - judge alone trial.
CASES CITED: R v Misra [2004] EWCA Crim 2375, applying R v Adomako [1995] 1 AC 171. R v Bateman(1925) 19 Cr App R 8
PARTIES: Department of Public Prosecution - Crown Dr G Pegios - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S): 07/11/0232
COUNSEL: Mr B Hughes - Crown Prosecutor Mr S Littlemore QC - Defendant
SOLICITORS: The Office of the Director of Public Prosecution - Crown Guild Legal - Defendant
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: JUDGE H.G. MURRELL SC
23 JUNE 2008
R v Pegios No: 07/11/0232
JUDGMENT.
1 On 6 November 2002, the accused, a dentist, performed a dental implant procedure upon SC. The accused used intravenous sedation to allay SC's anxiety about the unpleasant 1.5-3 hour procedure. SC suffered a critical loss of blood oxygen saturation. On 8 November 2002, he died of hypoxic brain damage.
2 The accused was charged that, on 8 November 2002 at Kogarah, he unlawfully killed the deceased (manslaughter by gross negligence).
3 The Crown alleged that the accused was grossly negligent in that: (1) while subjecting the deceased to sedation in his surgery, he negligently administered excessive drugs, causing the deceased to lose consciousness, and thereby risking airway compromise and oxygen desaturation; and (2) he negligently failed to respond appropriately when the deceased experienced oxygen desaturation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate