NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Faulks v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 205
DIVISION: Revenue Division
APPLICANT Kelly Faulks PARTIES: RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 106014
HEARING DATES: 5 August 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 5 August 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 18 August 2010
BEFORE: Perrignon R - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: First Home Owner Grant – applicant previously a registered proprietor of residential land as joint tenant – whether a 'relevant interest' in land - whether held on resulting trust
LEGISLATION CITED : First Home Owner Grant Act 2000
CASES CITED: Charles Marshall Pty Limited v Grimsley [1956] 95 CLR 365Damberg v Damberg & ors [2001] NSWCA 87Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 31 ALR 666Re Pochi and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 26 ALR 247
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT J Mitchell, barrister
ORDERS: Pursuant to section 29 of the First Home Owner Grant Act 2000, the Chief Commissioner's decision of 14 May 2010 is reversed and varied, so as to decide that the First Home Owner Grant is payable to Ms Faulks.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 In these proceedings, the Applicant Ms Faulks seeks review of the Chief Commissioner's decision to decline her application for the First Home Owner Grant.
2 On 14 May 2010 the Chief Commissioner had decided, pursuant to section 17 of the First Home Owner Grant Act 2000 ('the Act'), that he was not satisfied that the grant was payable, because Ms Faulks had previously been a registered proprietor of land at Eagle Vale near Campbelltown in Sydney. Objection was duly made by her and disallowed by the Chief Commissioner. It follows that the Tribunal has power to review the decision of 14 May 2010, and to make orders under section 29 of the Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate