NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Challita v NSW Department of Education and Training [2010] NSWADT 175
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANTS Jolanda and Peter Challita PARTIES: RESPONDENT NSW Department of Education and Training
FILE NUMBER: 083155
HEARING DATES: 25 November 2008
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 24 November 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 14 July 2010
BEFORE: Montgomery S - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Freedom of Information Act - access to documents
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Freedom of Information Act 1989
Challita v NSW Department of Education and Training (No.2) [2009] NSWADT 174 CASES CITED: Director General, Department of Education and Training v Mullett and Randazzo (No. 2) [2002] NSWADTAP 29 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury [2006] HCA 45 Robinson v Director General, Department of Health [2002] NSWADT 222
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT A Johnson, solicitor
ORDERS: The agency's decision to refuse access to the requested document is affirmed.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background 1 This matter is part of a series of applications brought by the applicants under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 ("the FOI Act") seeking access to documents held by the Department of Education and Training ("DET"). The documents sought concern the operations of the DET's selective schools unit, the Selective Schools process and the role of the Selection Committee.
2 The applicants requested access to three categories of documents. Jurisdictional issues in regard to part of the matter were the subject of my determination in Challita v NSW Department of Education and Training (No.2) [2009] NSWADT 174. That determination was the subject of an appeal, which was ultimately finalised on 24 November 2009.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate