NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 6 DCLR (NSW) 333
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Lifese Pty Limited v Adelaide Brighton Cement Limited [2008] NSWDC 38
HEARING DATE(S): 1 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 13 February 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: Dismiss application
CATCHWORDS: Contracts - Building Contract - Builder's claim for unpaid money - Effect of subsequent adjudication
LEGISLATION CITED: Building and Construction Industry Security Payment Act 1999 Civil Procedure Act 2005
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125, 129 CASES CITED: Heath v Goodwin (1987) 8 NSWLR 478, 482 John Holland Pty Ltd v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (2006) 66 NSWLR 624; affirmed on appeal [2007] NSWCA 140
PARTIES: Lifese Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Adelaide Brighton Cement Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 501 of 2007
COUNSEL: Mr N.A. Nicholls (Plaintiff) Mr M. Christie (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Mills Oakley (Plaintiff) Johnson Winter & Slattery Lawyers (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: On 8 April 2005, the parties entered into a contract for various works at the Hartley Quarry. Lifese Pty Limited ("Lifese") commenced these proceedings against Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd ("ABC") to have judgment entered for the sum of $500 699.99. It alleges that the sum is due and owing under the Building and Construction Industry Security Payment Act 1999 ('Building and Construction Act"), ss 14(4) and 15 (2), because ABC failed to serve any payment schedule in response to a claim served by Lifese on 5 December 2006.
2 This application is for leave by ABC to further amend its defence to include a defence said to be "an answer to the whole of the plaintiff's claim".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate