NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Thomas Douglas WATKINS [2006] NSWDC 54
HEARING DATE(S): 10/07/2006 - 03/08/2006 Trial 13/10/2006 - Sentence
JUDGMENT DATE: 13 October 2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/13/2006
JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ
DECISION: See paragraph 24
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Dishonesty - Sentence - Gambling - Breach of trust
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900
CASES CITED: Rv Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416
PARTIES: DPP Thomas Douglas WATKINS
FILE NUMBER(S): 05/11/0742
COUNSEL: S Higgins (Solicitor) - Crown A Martin - Accused
SOLICITORS: NSW DPP Nikola Velcic & Associates (Offender)
SENTENCE
1 HIS HONOUR: Thomas Douglas Watkins, known as Doug Watkins, was employed as the financial controller for a successful family company, Tasman KB Pty Limited. That company conducted its timber wholesaling business with a head office in Sydney and other offices in Brisbane and Melbourne. Over a considerable period of time the offender took over two million dollars from the company. He now stands to be sentenced on 43 separate charges under section 176A of the Crimes Act. Each offence carries a maximum penalty of 10 years.
2 The offender's crimes were relatively unsophisticated. He was not a signatory to any of the company's bank accounts, but he was permitted and indeed required to prepare cheques for signatures by one of the three signatories. On 43 separate occasions he presented a cheque to a particular signatory, David McAndrew. Each time the cheque was presented to Mr McAndrew for his signature, the payee line read "Pay Westpac St Marys". Mr McAndrew, no doubt influenced by his trust in the offender, believed that these were cheques which needed to be signed in order to effect a transfer from the company's Brisbane bank account to the company's Sydney bank account. The cheques were all drawn on the Brisbane account and the company had an account at the St Marys branch of the Westpac Bank, so Mr McAndrew signed the cheques. The offender had left a gap between the word "Pay" which is printed on the cheque and his handwritten entry "Westpac St Marys". Into each of those gaps the offender wrote the words "T Watkins", so that the payee line on the cheques now read "Pay T Watkins Westpac St Marys". He then deposited each of the 43 cheques into his own personal bank account at Westpac St Marys and spent the money gambling.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate