NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Tariq McDonald [2009] NSWDC 330 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 25 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 September 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Knox SC DCJ
On count 1, the offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 12 months imprisonment commencing on 20 March 2011 and expiring on 20 March 2012. On count 2, the offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months imprisonment commencing on 20 November 2007 and expiring on 19 March 2011 with an additional term of 2 years and 8 months (expiring on 19 November 2013). DECISION: On courts 3 and 4, the offender is sentenced to a fixed term of 12 months imprisonment commencing on 20 November 2007 and expiring on 19 November 2008. The sentences on counts 2, 3 and 4 are to be served concurrently. The sentences reflect a finding of special circumstances of the order of 72%. The offender is to be released to parole on 20 March 2012.
CATCHWORDS: ATM shopping centre - Aggravated break and enter - Planning involved - Principles to be applied
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
R v Anderson [2004] NSWCCA 39 R v BB [2005] NSWCCA 215 R v Ceissman [2004] NSWCCA 466 R v Chen [2004] NSWCCA 369 R v Crowe [2002] NSWCCA 245 CASES CITED: R v Dodd [2004] NSWCCA 374 R v Douglas [2006] NSWCCA 94 R v Huynh [2005] NSWCCA 220 R v Roberts [2005] NSWCCA 401 R v Warren [2003] NSWCCA 366 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate