NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Linnell v Seachem Australia Pty Ltd [2010] NSWADT 111
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Patricia Linnell PARTIES: RESPONDENT Seachem Australia Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER: 091114
HEARING DATES: 26 March 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 12 May 2010
BEFORE: Scahill A - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Dismissal of complaint –sexual harassment– victimisation
LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Carter v Linuki Pty Ltd [2005] NSWADTAP 40 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Orr (EOD) [2001] NSWADTAP 16 Dee v Commissioner of Police & Anor (2003) NSW ADT 217 Ehl v Department of Education and Training and NSW Teachers Federation (1999) NSW ADT 102 Fricke v Whyburn [2003] NSW ADT 10 CASES CITED: Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 Razaghi v Director-General, NSW Department of Health & Anor [2001] NSWADT 4 Reyes-Gonzalez v Sydney Institute of Technology (1998) NSWEOT at 6 Sullivan v State of NSW (NSW Police Force) [2009] NSWADT 2 Treddinick-v- Wentworth Area Health Service [2000] NSWADT 172
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT Mr. Woods of Counsel
The Application under section 102 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 is dismissed. The proceedings are to be set down for a further case conference on 16 June 2010 at 12:30pm for the purpose of : ORDERS: Setting a timetable for further filing Dealing with the issue of whether Ms Rebecca Humphries should be joined as a Respondent; and Fixing a time and venue for the hearing of the complaint.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate