NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 6 DCLR(NSW) 6
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Dunstan v Rickwood [2006] NSWDC 170
HEARING DATE(S): 09/10/06 - 11/10/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 October 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: Court has jurisdiction
CATCHWORDS: Jurisdiction - Residence
LEGISLATION CITED: Property (Relationships) Act 1984
Kemp v Webber (2003) ACT SC 7 Havsat v Director General Social Security (1985) 60 ALR 674 Gregory v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation Western Australia (1937) 57 CLR 774 CASES CITED: Commissioner of Taxation v Miller (1946) 73 CLR 93 Lavine v The Inland Revenue Commissioners [1928] Appeal Cases 217 Fox v Stirk [1973] 3 All England Reports 7 The Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Applegate 79 Australian Tax Cases 4307
PARTIES: Ross Dunstan (Plaintiff) Julie Rickwood (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 942 of 2005
COUNSEL: Mr G Brsztowski SC (Plaintiff) Mr R Maurice (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Crowley Clifford Simpson (Plaintiff) Lessli Strong & Associates (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 This is a claim by the plaintiff, Mr Dunstan, against the defendant, Ms Rickwood, under the Property (Relationships) Act 1984.
2 The relationship commenced in 1993 and finished in 2002. For most of the period of that relationship the parties lived in a property in Duffy Street, Ainslie, in the ACT. They also separately acquired and disposed of other properties during that period.
3 Before the relationship ended the plaintiff bought a property at 161 Annetts Parade, Mossy Point, New South Wales. He says that when the relationship ended he went to live there and he was living there at the time that these proceedings were commenced in April 2003. He says that since that time, although he retains the property at Mossy Point and goes there when he can, he now lives with his new partner in the ACT.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate