NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Haswell -V- Nsw Department Of School Education, Metropolitan East Region [1997] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: Elizabeth Haswell
RESPONDENT: NSW Department of School Education, Metropolitan East Region
NUMBER: 17 of 1994 & 81 of 1995
Mr Michael Biddulph ( Judicial Member ) TRIBUNAL: Ms L Farmer OAM Mr M Luger
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Discrimination on the ground of sex in the area of employment
DATES OF HEARING: 08/21/1996; 08/22/1996; 08/28/1996; 09/25/1996; 09/26/1996; 09/27/1996; 11/08/1996; 11/13/1996; 11/14/1996; 11/21/1996; 11/22/1996; 12/12/1996 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/26/1997
Complainant: Tress Cocks & Maddox (Solicitors) Mr P Clay (Counsel) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Crown Solicitor's Office (Solicitors) Ms C Ronalds (Counsel)
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF:
Details of complaints
On 28 February 1993 the Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW("the Board") received a complaint from Ms Elizabeth Haswell alleging discrimination on the ground of sex in the area of employment, against the NSW Department of School Education, Metropolitan East Region. Conciliation conferences were held in the matter, but were not resolved. The President therefore referred the complaint to this Tribunal in accordance with section 94(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 ("the Act").
Attached to the President's letter concerning the complaint was a report of his inquires into such complaint, and we set them out shortly as follows: The Complainant alleged that she was treated unfairly by the principal of her school and that decisions were made by the principal which she disagreed with, but her opinions were ignored because she is a woman. She also received an unfavourable work report from the principal. This report was later amended by the principal but not to Ms Haswell's satisfaction.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate