NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v AHMED [2008] NSWDC 380
13 March 2008 HEARING DATE(S): 22 April 2008 22 October 2008 31 October 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 October 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Bennett SC DCJ
DECISION: At [32]
CATCHWORDS: CRIME – Appeal against penalty – 2 driving offences committed on the same day – subsequent convictions entered on the same day – whether the latter offence was a "second or subsequent offence" for the purposes of imposing penalty under s 25(2) Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Act 1998 – both offences dealt with as "first offences"
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; s 10A LEGISLATION CITED: Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Act 1998; s 25A Traffic Act 1925 (Tas); s 41
Clarke v Bradlaugh (1881) 8 QBD 63 Edwards v The Queen (1854) 9 Ex. 628 re F B Warren Ex Parte A M Wheeler v The Trustee in Bankruptcy [1938] Ch 725 CASES CITED: The King v The Licensing Justice for the County Borough of South Shields [1911] 2 KB 1 R v Miller [1986] 2 Qd R 518 O'Hara v Harrington [1962] Tas SR 165 Prowse v McIntyre and Others (1961) 35 ALJR 373 Shane William Johnson v R [2008] NSWDC 47
PARTIES: The Crown Samar AHMED
FILE NUMBER(S): 2009 / 2232
SOLICITORS: Mr A Kirupaidasan – DPP Mr R Bartley – R J Bartley & Associates
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
2008 / 2232
BENNETT SC DCJ
Friday 31 October 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate