NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Cong Khanh TRAN [2008] NSWDC 43
HEARING DATE(S): 7 March 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 March 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Norrish QC DCJ
Orders: DECISION: (1) The Court declines to make orders sought by the applicant at this time. (2) It reserves on the question of costs until all issues are resolved. (3) I grant liberty for the parties to further apply with seven (7) days notice.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Stay of proceedings - Costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995
R v Mosely (1992) 28 NSWLR 735 R v Fisher (2003) 183 A Crim R 318 CASES CITED: R v Nguyen [2007] NSWCCA 249 Jago v District Court of NSW (1989) 168 CLR 23 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 Hufnagl v DPP (Cth) [2007] NSWDC 130
PARTIES: Regina v Cong Khanh Tran
FILE NUMBER(S): 2006/00014615
COUNSEL: S Bowers (Crown) S Russell (Offender)
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1 Cong Khanh Tran (the applicant) moves the Court for an order that the proceedings contemplated by the Director of Public Prosecutions be stayed until "costs of proceedings to date are paid by the prosecution" and consequential orders.
2 The applicant seeks costs in respect of four aspects of the proceedings involving him, as well as costs for the application. The applicant seeks costs in respect of : (i) proceedings on the 26 April 2007, due to the "unreasonable argument mounted … regarding the admission of the Statement of Facts for Giac Nguyen"; (ii) proceedings of 27 April 2007, in respect the admissibility of the evidence from Detective Luc Nguyen; (iii) the preparation for a s.5F appeal filed by the Director and later withdrawn; (iv) in respect of proceedings listed to commence on 12 November 2007 but adjourned because new expert evidence was served late on the applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate