NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Focal Holdings Pty Ltd v NSW Vocational Education and Training Accreditation Board [2010] NSWADT 226
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT Focal Holdings Pty Ltd PARTIES:
RESPONDENT NSW Vocational Education and Training Accreditation Board
FILE NUMBER: 103010
HEARING DATES: 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21 May 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 21 May 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 14 September 2010
BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President); Burke T - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: VOCATIONAL EDUCATION - Cancellation of registration and approval - whether applicant's ethical standards warrant registration and approval
LEGISLATION CITED : Vocational Education and Training Act 2005 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
CASES CITED: Sydney Business Institute Pty Ltd v NSW Vocational Education and Training Accreditation Board [2009] NSWADT 322 Austech Institute for Further Education v Vocational Education and Training Accreditation Board [2009] NSWADT 323
APPLICANT M Cleary, barrister REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT P Cribb, solicitor
1. The respondent's decision to cancel the applicant's registration as a training organisation is set aside 2. The respondent's decision to refuse the applicant's application for renewal of registration as a training organisation is set aside. In substitution for that decision a decision is made to register the applicant as a training organisation ORDERS: 3. The respondent's decision to cancel the applicant's approval to provide courses to overseas students is set aside. 4. The respondent's decision to refuse the applicant's application for renewal of approval to provide courses to overseas students is set aside. In substitution for that decision a decision is made to approve the applicant to provide the courses to overseas students for which it had approval prior to the decisions under review being made. The approval is made on condition that the courses be conducted from the Greenfield Parade, Bankstown premises occupied by the applicant. In addition, the maximum number of students that can be enrolled and studying at those premises is 350 5. The respondent's decision to impose a condition on the applicant to prevent it from recruiting or enrolling any new students is set aside.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate