NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v MACPHEE [2008] NSWDC 290
HEARING DATE(S): December 1- 2, 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 December 2008
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Murrell SC DCJ at 20
DECISION: Guilty of deemed supply
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - particular offences - drug offences - possession - for sale or supply - Judge alone trial
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
PARTIES: Regina Michael MacPhee (Accused)
FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/00008167
COUNSEL: Mr M Fernandez (Crown) Mr B Galloway (Accused)
JUDGMENT
1. On 28 November 2008, the accused was arraigned on two counts. He pleaded guilty to the offence that, on 9 October 2007 he cultivated a commercial quantity of cannabis (56 plants). He pleaded not guilty to the offence that, on the same date he supplied cannabis leaf. The Crown alleges a "deemed supply", i.e. that the accused was in possession of 354.7g of cannabis leaf, a quantity in excess of 300 g, the "trafficable quantity" for cannabis leaf.
2. In relation to the "deemed supply" count, on 27 November 2008 the accused elected to be tried by a judge alone and DPP consented. I was satisfied that, before making the election, the accused had sought and received advice from his barrister.
Overview
3. On 9 October 2007, police executed a search warrant at a house rented by the accused.
4. The accused showed police to a concealed room under the house that was entered via the garage. In the room, 20 substantial cannabis plants were being cultivated utilising special lighting and a drip system. In an adjoining area, there were fertilisers and pH balancing chemicals. Next to the cultivation room was an area containing ropes from which cannabis could be hung to dry. Beneath the ropes, was a plastic tarpaulin. There were cannabis remnants on the tarpaulin. Upstairs in the house, the accused showed police a cupboard in which 36 cannabis seedlings were being cultivated under lights. The 20 large plants and 36 seedings are the subject of the cultivation count.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate