NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Lawson v Bourke [2008] NSWDC 100
HEARING DATE(S): 26-29 November 2007, 3-7 & 10 December 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 June 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
DECISION: 1. Stood over to a date to be fixed to finalise the calculation of the judgment sum, deal with issues of costs and to enter final orders. 2. My reasons are published.
CATCHWORDS: MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - Credit - Whether plaintiff feigning physical/psychiatric injury and disability - Weight to be placed on psychological testing
LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
PARTIES: Merrill Dawn Lawson Kristy Bourke
FILE NUMBER(S): Newcastle 102/07
COUNSEL: H Halligan (Plaintiff) S E McCarthy (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Brazel Moore (Plaintiff) McLachlan Chilton (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 Merrill Dawn Lawson was involved in a motor vehicle accident on 7 September 2002. She was a passenger in a car driven by her husband John Lawson. Their car was struck from the rear by a car driven by Kristy Bourke. There was some dispute concerning the precise circumstances of the accident but it was not disputed that the defendant was in breach of her duty of care to the plaintiff.
2 The plaintiff complained of significant physical and psychological injuries as a result of the accident. The issues were: 1 Whether the plaintiff's evidence of injury, damage and loss should be believed. 2 The circumstances of the accident and the plaintiff's immediate post accident presentation. 3 The nature of the injuries and disabilities suffered by the plaintiff as a consequence of the accident. 4 The compensation, if any, to be awarded for non-economic loss, past and future income loss, past and future domestic and attendant care services and past and future medical and other expenses.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate