NSW Caselaw
The Legal Services Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Neil Graham Hughes [1994] NSWLST 6 PARTIES : Neil Graham Hughes FILE NUMBER(S) : of 1994 CORAM: Mr G B Molloy (Presiding Member) - Vice Admiral I Knox - Mr P. Boesenberg CATCHWORDS: Professional Misconduct - forgery - Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 61 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - make false statement - Professional Misconduct - fail to act honestly - Professional Misconduct - fail to keep accounts - Professional Misconduct - misappropriate trust moneys/moneys :- LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act 1987 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 21 March 1994 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/21/1994 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr G. Chegwidden for the Law Society of New South Wales. There was no appearance on behalf of the Solicitor.
JUDGMENT:
The Chairman: This tribunal has before it a complaint by the Law Society of New South Wales against a solicitor, Neil Graham Hughes, filed 21 January 1994, in which it alleges a number of failures to account, misappropriation of funds, breaches of sections 61.1 and 62.2 of the Legal Profession Act, forgeries, preparation of false wills, and also the tribunal notes that in the second report of the chartered accountant, Ms Jean Sayer, on page 20, there is a statement that a signature on a document styled an application for redemption of a savings was also forged.
The tribunal is satisfied on the evidence admitted to the requisite standard of proof that the solicitor is guilty of professional misconduct in relation to each of the complaints and in relation to the totality of the complaints. The tribunal is satisfied that this solicitor is not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of solicitors in this state. Consequently the tribunal makes the following orders:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate