NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Bradford v Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council [2010] NSWADT 45
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT Jeffrey John Bradford PARTIES: RESPONDENT Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council
FILE NUMBER: 083356
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 14 December 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 15 February 2010
BEFORE: Montgomery S - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
CASES CITED: Bradford v Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council [2009] NSWADT 41
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT P Woods, solicitor
ORDERS: Each party is to pay its own costs in the proceedings
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 By letter dated 15 October 2008, the Applicant applied to the Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council ("the Land Council") pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act 1989 ("the FOI Act"). His application was as follows: The Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council (DWLC) is a body corporate constituted under the Aboriginal Land Rights 1983. I further note that the Land Council is a public authority and therefore subject to the conditions of s. 7 of the Freedom of Information Act 1989. I have recently been approached by a number of concerned DLALC members that certain decisions have been made by the Board without reference to the Membership. In this regard, I seek copies of all Board minutes, notes or records regarding the decision process taken by the Board with the recent appointment of the CEO. In addition to the above, I am informed an offer to settle a legal matter involving Mr Cunliffe was rejected out of hand and with very and unnecessary extreme haste. Please provide all copies of any minutes, notes or other records that detail the decision making process undertaken by the Board in this regard.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate