NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Morgan v Rankin (No 2) [2008] NSWDC 183
HEARING DATE(S): 22 August 2008 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 22 August 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
1. The application is dismissed. DECISION: 2. The affidavit filed in support of the application is returned. 3. The order for costs made on 14 August 2008 is confirmed. 4. The first and third defendants are to pay the plaintiffs' costs of today's application.
CATCHWORDS: STAY - of orders pending appeal - refusal
Scott Anthony Morgan (First Plaintiff) Annette Frances Morgan (Second Plaintiff) PARTIES: Phillip Norman Rankin (First Defendant) Gregg Morgan (Second Defendant) David Warne (Third Defendant) Darren Van Aardt (Fourth Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): Newcastle 438/07
COUNSEL: N M Coren (Plaintiffs) G Jensen (First and Third Defendants)
SOLICITORS: Thomas Mitchell (Plaintiffs) NOT Lawyers (First and Third Defendants)
JUDGMENT
1 In this matter the first and third defendants against whom judgment was entered on 14 August 2008 have applied for a stay of the orders for payment to the plaintiffs made on that date.
2 Their application is based upon their concern that the plaintiffs may not be able to repay monies ordered to be paid to them if the appeal that they propose to bring is successful. As I pointed out in debate there is no evidence before me that the plaintiffs, if the appeal is lost, would not be able to repay the verdict monies.
3 The evidence before the court was that they were financially capable of raising $200,000 and subsequently $100,000 for the purpose of investment with the defendants' company, that they are both employed and that they are long term residents in the Newcastle area.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate