NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Koondoola Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v Woodlawn Pastoral Pty Ltd [2009] NSWDC 327
HEARING DATE(S): 12-13 November 2009, 18 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 December 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 2 December 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court - Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
Orders in accordance with the Short Minutes of Order signed and dated 9 December 2009 DECISION: Verdict and judgement for the plaintiffs as set out in paragraph 1 Verdict and judgement for the cross-defendants on the cross-claimant's cross claim as set out in paragraph 2 Paragraph 3 noted and the exhibits are returned as noted in paragraph 4
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT FOR SUPPLY OF WATER - Construction of terms - Whether provisions totally in writing - Partly express oral or partly implied - Whether frustrated by less than anticipated water flows
LEGISLATION CITED: Water Management Act 2000
BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Limited v Hastings Shire Council 52 ALJR 20 Codelfa Construction Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales 149 CLR 337 CASES CITED: Davis Contractors Limited v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696 National Carriers Limited v Panalpina (Northern) Limited [1981] AC 675 Toll (FGCT) Pty Limited v Alphapharm Pty Limited 219 CLR 165
PARTIES: Koondoola Pastoral Company Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Woodlawn Pastoral Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 337/2008
COUNSEL: S J Stanton and L Wilson (For the Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) M Hadley (For the Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate