NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Kyla Michaela BURROWS [2007] NSWDC 28
HEARING DATE(S): 08/02/2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 February 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 8 February 2007
JURISDICTION: Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ
DECISION: See paragraph [21]
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Sentence when serving a sentence for a more serious matter - Obtain money by deception - Position of trust
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act
PARTIES: Crown Kyla Michaela Burrows
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0984
SOLICITORS: NSW DPP Legal Aid Commission
SENTENCE
1 HIS HONOUR: Kyla Burrows appears for sentence today on four offences of obtaining money for herself by deception. When sentencing her for one of those, the most serious of the offences on the indictment, she asks that I take into account a further thirty-eight similar matters.
2 These offences all arose as part of the ongoing dishonest enterprise which Ms Burrows conducted in order to feed her drug addiction. Ms Burrows was awaiting sentence for supplying a prohibited drug, the prohibited drug being heroin. Despite being on bail for this matter she continued to use drugs herself.
3 She applied for and was successful in obtaining a job with a bathroom design company. As part of that job she was given access to the accounts of the company, which she was able to access electronically. She was able to transfer various funds and pay various suppliers. It was her responsibility to see that the company's bills were paid.
4 A very short time after she began employment with this company she began to divert company moneys to her own purposes. A cursory glance at the company's accounts would not reveal what the offender had done. She simply electronically transferred company moneys into accounts she controlled, either herself or with her boyfriend, but made it look as though the money had been used to pay the company debtors. This was not a terribly sophisticated scheme and one that was always going to come undone when someone who was owed money by the company made an enquiry as to why they had not been paid.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate