NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Guff v The Commissioner of Police (No 1) [2007] NSWDC 289
HEARING DATE(S): 15 October 2007 - 25 October 2007 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil (Residual Jurisdiction)
JUDGMENT OF: Neilson DCJ at 1
DECISION: Defendant's application to amend his defence refused
CATCHWORDS: Application under Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 - Defendant seeks leave to amend his defence to raise a limitation provision in section 21 (appeal to be made within 6 months of defendant's decision as to whether death of policeman was caused by his having been hurt on duty) - Two groups of plaintiffs. First group: children of deceased from former marriage. Second group: wife and children to whom deceased stood in loco parentis - First group appealed within time (not having been notified of defendant's decision) - Second group subsequently joined as defendants but subsequently made plaintiffs - Leave to amend defence made on first day of hearing - Leave refused - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 14.14(2), 14.14(3) - Civil Procedure Act 2005, section 58 and section 64(2) - Clough v Frog (1974) 48 ALJR 481 - Consideration of former practice and procedure under Workers Compensation legislation
LEGISLATION CITED: Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 Civil Procedure Act 2005
CASES CITED: Clough v Frog (1974) 48 ALJR 481
C. Guff, L. Guff, E. Guff, M. Guff by their tutor J. Marshall (First Plaintiffs) D. Guff (Second Plaintiff) PARTIES: S. Erichsen by her tutor D. Guff (Third Plaintiff) D. Erichsen by her tutor D. Guff (Fourth Plaintiff) The Commissioner of Police (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate