NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Allen v Bennett [2008] NSWDC 119
HEARING DATE(S): 22-23 October 2007, 27-29 February, 3 March 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 August 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Sidis DCJ
DECISION: 1 Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $644,165.53. 2 The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. 3 The exhibits are to be retained for 28 days.
CATCHWORDS: TORT NEGLIGENCE - tree lopper - Credit - multiple prior injuries - injury in course of employment involving motor vehicle - whether to be dealt with under legislation providing compensation for motor vehicle accident or work place injury
LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999
CASES CITED: Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438
PARTIES: Michael ALLEN (Plaintiff) Ian BENNETT (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): Newcastle 21/05
COUNSEL: C A W Hart (Plaintiff) A P Capelin (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Bale Boshev (Plaintiff ) TL Lawyers (Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 Michael Allen claimed that he suffered injuries to various intestinal structures when his torso was compressed against the trunk of a eucalypt. At the time of his injury the plaintiff was working as a tree climber on a property at New Lambton. The plaintiff claimed that his injuries were the result of the negligence of his employer, Ian Bennett. The defendant denied negligence and did not accept the plaintiff's claims of loss and injury.
2 The issues involved in deciding the plaintiff's claim were: 1 The circumstances in which his injuries occurred. 2 Whether those circumstances involved negligence on the part of the defendant. 3 Whether the claim was appropriately brought pursuant to the provisions of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999. 4 The nature and extent of the injuries suffered by the plaintiff. 5 The extent to which the plaintiff was to be compensated, in particular for loss of income earning capacity.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate