NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Hurcum v Domino's Pizza Australia Pty Limited [2007] NSWDC 73
HEARING DATE(S): 05/12/06, 06/12/06, 13/12/06, 02/02/07, 16/02/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 March 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Gibson DCJ
DECISION: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff for $4,518.00; 2. Defendant pay plaintiff's costs; 3. Liberty to restore in relation to order 2; 4. Exhibits retained for 28 days.
CATCHWORDS: Tort – personal injury – defence of fraud – quantum – claim for non-economic loss falls below threshold – claim rejected for past and future economic loss by a plaintiff with no work history and transient injury
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Occupational Health & Safety Act 2000 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth)
Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2002] NSWCA 419 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Goodrich Aerospace v Arsic [2006] NSWCA 187 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 CASES CITED: Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 510 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors (1992) 67 ALJR 170 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Premier Group v Lippis [2007] NSWCA 36 Rufo v Hosking (2004) 61 NSWLR 678 State of New South Wales v Burton [2006] NSWCA 12 Steffen v Ruban [1966] 2 NSWR 622 The Nominal Defendant v Kostic [2007] NSWCA 14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate