NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - External
CITATION: KI v Public Guardian [2008] NSWADTAP 88
APPELLANT KI PARTIES: RESPONDENT Public Guardian
FILE NUMBER: 088018
HEARING DATES: 22 December 2008
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 22 December 2008
EXTEMPORE DECISION DATE: 22 December 2008 BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President)
DECISION UNDER APPEAL: C/35242
FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 2007/1051
APPELLANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT No appearance
ORDERS: Appeal dismissed
REASONS FOR DECISION 1 KI has requested written reasons for a decision made on 22 December 2008 to dismiss his external appeal by consent. 2 On 25 November 2008 KI lodged a Notice of Appeal against a decision of the Guardianship Tribunal made on 18 February 2008. In that decision, the Guardianship Tribunal decided that a guardianship order relating to KI should lapse. The effect of the order was that the Public Guardian no longer had any authority to make decisions on behalf of KI. 3 At the hearing I questioned KI about the Notice of Appeal. It became apparent following that questioning that he did not wish to appeal against the Guardianship Tribunal's decision. His concern was a document dated 20 February 2008 that the Public Guardian provided to him following the Guardianship Tribunal's decision. That document, entitled "Client Audit" stated that the reason for the audit was that the Public Guardian had been discharged. Next to the heading "Current File Category" were the words "monitoring with advocacy". Despite my repeated assurances, KI was of the view that this meant that the Public Guardian is continuing to monitor him despite the Guardianship Tribunal's decision. 4 After some further discussion, KI consented to the appeal against the Guardianship Tribunal's decision being dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate