NSW Caselaw
Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION: Hughes -V- Bowral Cooperative Trading Limited & Ors [1997] NSWEOT
COMPLAINANT: John Raymond Hughes
RESPONDENT: Bowral Cooperative Trading Limited, George Neich, Shane Whatman, Billy Ridley
NUMBER: 30 of 1997
TRIBUNAL: Judge H G Murrell S.C. ( Senior Judicial Member )
GROUNDS OF COMPLAINT: Homosexual discrimination in employment
DATES OF HEARING: 03/04/1998 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/24/1998
Complainant: Mr C. Howell of Counsel instructed by R L Whyburn & Associates
Respondent: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: First Respondent Ms K Barratt, Divisional Manager, Employee Relations, Employer's Federation of NSW
Second, Third and Fourth Respondents Mr J Shaw of Counsel instructed by B Bilinsky & Co
JUDGMENT IN FAVOUR OF: Complainant
Summary
Background
1. The first respondent was the complainant's former employer. At the time that the complainant was so employed, the second third and fourth respondents were employees of the first respondent.
2. Outside the section 88(3) six month statutory period, the complainant sought to make a compliant against the first respondent, alleging discrimination on the basis of perceived homosexuality.
3. After considering submissions by the first respondent, the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board accepted the complaint out of time.
4. Conciliation failed. The President referred the complaint to the Equal Opportunity Tribunal.
5. Without prior notice to the second, third or fourth respondents and in the absence of those respondents, at a directions hearing before the Tribunal the complainant was permitted to join the second, third and fourth respondents.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate