NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Snowpave Pty Limited v Gibo Pty Limited; Gibo Pty Limited v Snowpave Pty Limited and Edite Pty Limited [2010] NSWADT 216
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
Applicant: Snowpave Pty Limited
Respondent: Gibo Pty Limited
PARTIES: First Cross Applicant: Gibo Pty Limited
Second Cross Applicant: Edite Pty Limited
Cross Respondent: Snowpave Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER: 085112, 085145
HEARING DATES: 21,22 May 2009 24 August 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 24 August 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 27 August 2010
BEFORE: Olsson E, SC - Deputy President
LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994
Wyllie v Tarrison Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 184; Ryledar Pty Ltd t/as Volume Plus v Euphoric Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 65; CASES CITED: Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 All ER 98; Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) v St Martins Investments (1979) 144 CLR 596 at 606; Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 at 179; Leigh-Mardon Pty Ltd v Wawn (1995) 17 ACSR 741
Applicant Representative: Mr D Mitchell for Snowpave REPRESENTATION: Respondent Representative: Mr T Maltz of counsel for Gibo and Edite
ORDERS: See paragraphs 69 – 75
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The essence of this dispute is the contractual interpretation of a clause (clause 20) in a lease executed on 29 September 2006 but expressed to commence on 1 July 2006 made between the Applicant and Cross Respondent, Snowpave Pty Ltd and the Respondent and Cross Applicant, Gibo Pty Ltd.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate