NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Safwat Beshara v Australian Postal Corporation; Australian Postal Corporation v Swan Services Pty Ltd; Swan Services Pty Ltd v The Underwriter Insurance Company Pty Ltd; Australian Postal Corporation v The Underwriter Insurance Company Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWDC 72
HEARING DATE(S): 7 -16 April 2008 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 April 2008
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: 1. Verdict for the defendant. 2. Dismiss the cross-claims.
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE - Occupier
LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Act 1987
CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298
Safwat Beshara (Plaintiff) PARTIES: Australian Postal Corporation (Defendant/Cross Claimant) Swan Services Pty Ltd (Cross Defendant/Cross Claimant) The Underwriter Insurance Company Pty Ltd (Cross Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 4885 of 2003
E G Romaniuk (Plaintiff) COUNSEL: T McKenzie (Defendant/Cross Claimant) D T Miller with M Castle (Cross Defendant/Cross Claimant) R A Cavanagh (Cross Defendant)
Keddies (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS: Graham Jones Lawyers (Defendant/Cross Claimant) Moray & Agnew (Cross Defendant/Cross Claimant) DLA Phillips Fox (Cross Defendant)
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR: The plaintiff, Safwat Beshara, brought this action against the defendant as occupier of a mechanical workshop at Granville, where he was employed as a cleaner in the first few months of 2002. On 29 April that year the plaintiff fell down some steel steps leading to an inspection pit under the floor level of the workshop while he was taking a polishing machine down the stairs. He slipped or lost his footing. The mishap has been described in both ways, but I have reached the conclusion that there is no real distinction between the words used, as the incident was the same and it was a slip or a loss of footing.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate