NSW Caselaw
CITATION: 1 Rocky Point Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 19
DIVISION: Revenue Division
APPLICANT 1 Rocky Point Pty Limited PARTIES: RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 096091
HEARING DATES: 20 November 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 21 January 2010
BEFORE: Verick A - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Dismissal of proceedings – misconceived or lacking in substance
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Land Tax Management Act 1956 Anti Discrimination Act 1977
Chief Commissioner of Land Tax v Macary Manufacturing Pty Limited [1999] NSWCA 471 Paliflex Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] 215 ALR 681 BBLT Pty Limited v Commissioner of the Office of State Revenue [2003] ATC 5063 Avitaia and ors v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2008] NSWADTAP 57 Margan v University of Technology, Sydney (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 65 CASES CITED: Assal v Department of Health, Housing & Community Services (1992) EOC 92-409 Nagasinghe v Worthington (1994) 53 FCR 175 Ebber v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 129 ALR 455 State Electricity Commission of Victoria v Rabel [1998] 1 VR 102 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 Legal Services Commissioner v Ball [2001] NSWADT 86
APPLICANT I S Young, counsel REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT A H Rider, counsel
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate