NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Harms v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2010] NSWADT 183
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
APPLICANT Allan Frederick Harms PARTIES: RESPONDENT Sydney South West Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER: 091096, 091023
HEARING DATES: 15 June 2010
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 15 June 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 21 July 2010
BEFORE: Patten D - Deputy President; Monaghan-Nagle L - Non-Judicial Member; Hayes E - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Alleged Victimisation, Discrimination – Insufficient Evidence to Establish
LEGISLATION CITED : Anti Discrimination Act (NSW) 1977
APPLICANT Self Represented REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT S Price, solicitor
ORDERS: 1. All complaints are dismissed 2. No order as to costs.
REASONS FOR DECISION
1 The applicant Mr. Allan Harms in effect contends that the respondent: i) Unlawfully discriminated against him as his wife's carer contrary to S49T of the Anti-Discrimination Act (the Act), ii) Victimised him contrary to S49U of the Act following his complaint to the Anti-Discrimination Board.
2 At the hearing before the Tribunal Mr Harms appeared for himself. Ms. S. Price solicitor appeared for the respondent.
3 Substantially Mr. Harms relied upon his statement of facts dated 3 February 2010 upon which he was cross-examined by Ms. Price. Generally in our opinion he was a witness who did his best to tell the truth and assist the Tribunal. Nonetheless for reasons which follow neither of his complaints was established.
4 It appears that the applicant commenced employment with the respondent as a casual security guard on 16 January 2006. He became a full time employee on or about 15 January 2007. He performed his duties in shifts according to rosters, a subject to which we will need to return.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate