NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Vasilikopoulos v New South Wales Department of Housing [2009] NSWDC 114
HEARING DATE(S): 6, 7 and 8 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 June 2009
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Hungerford ADCJ
DECISION: Verdict for the defendant against the plaintiff; parties to be heard on costs before final orders are made.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS - Negligence - Personal injury - Rented residential premises - Injury to member of tenant's household - Fall in bathroom - Unsuitability of bathroom faciltities due to resultant condition from two total knee replacements - Liability of landlord - Whether a relevant duty of care and breach thereof - Duty limited to remedying defects in the premises - Whether a conventional bathroom can be a dangerous defect - Contributory negligence - Assessment of damges
Civil Liability Act 2002, ss 15(2), 15(3) and 16(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Housing Act 2001 Residential Tenancies Act 1987
Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 Bankstown Foundry Pty Ltd v Braistina (1986) 160 CLR 301 Bryant v New South Wales Department of Housing [2007] NSWDC 208 Cavalier v Pope [1906] AC 428 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 CASES CITED: Gray v Queensland Housing Commission [2004] QSC 276 Indermaur v Dames (1866) LR 1 CP 274 Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166 Le Lievre v Gould [1893] 1 QB 491 Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris (1997) 188 CLR 313 Parker v South Australian Housing Trust (1986) 41 SASR 493 Roads and Traffic Authority v McGregor [2005] NSWCA 388
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate