NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Putri Kenanga Pty Ltd v Pham [2009] NSWADT 301
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
FIRST APPLICANT Putri Kenanga Pty Ltd
SECOND APPLICANT Andre Japardi
PARTIES: THIRD APPLICANT Herlina Lie
FIRST RESPONDENT Binh Van Pham
SECOND RESPONDENT Truan Trinh Pham
FILE NUMBER: 085193
HEARING DATES: 13, 14 and 17 July 2009
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 9 September 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 4 December 2009
BEFORE: Chesterman M - Deputy President; Griffiths G - Non-Judicial Member ; Harrison B - Non-Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Retail lease – parties to lease – overpayment of bond – termination for non-payment of rent – unconscionable conduct – misleading or deceptive conduct
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 Retail Leases Act 1994
Armstrong Jones Management Pty Ltd v Saies-Bond & Associates Pty Ltd (RLD) [2007] NSWADTAP 47 Attorney General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 557 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 Gumland v Duffy [2006] NSWSC 10 Lyons Road Pty Ltd v The Owners Strata Plan 38722 (RLD) [2008] NSWADTAP 28 CASES CITED: Owendale Pty Ltd v Anthony (1967) 117 CLR 539 Parris v Katsivardis [2002] NSWADT 150 Sarker v World Best Holdings Ltd (No 4) [2008] NSWADT 75 Spathis v Hanave Investment Co Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 304 Tennent & Ors v Moukhlina & Ors (RLD) [2008] NSWADTAP 83 Vale v Rosychamp [2008] NSWSC 1373 Wallis Lake Fishermen's Co-operative Ltd v A.C.N. 079 830 596 Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 925
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate