NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: Mayers v Next Contact Pty Ltd [2007] NSWDC 121
HEARING DATE(S): 30/04/2007 - 04/05/2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 May 2007
JURISDICTION: Civil
JUDGMENT OF: Goldring DCJ
DECISION: Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $110,187
CATCHWORDS: Contract - contract for services or contract of employment - repudiation - damages
Bostik (Australia) Pty Ltd v Gorgevski (no 1) (1992) 36 FCR 20 at 32 Bruce v AWB Limited [No 2] [2000] IR 296 Byrne and Frew v Australian Airlines (1995) 185 CLR 410 Gunton v Richmond LBC [1981] 1 Ch 448 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited [2006] FCAFC 101 Finucane v New South Wales Egg Corporation (1988) 80 ALR 486 at 520-523 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Limited (1991) 174 CLR 64 CASES CITED: Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex 850, at p 855 (154 ER 363, at p 365) Wenham v Ella (1972) 127 CLR 454 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341, 354 Murray Irrigation Limited v Balsdon [2006] NSWCA 253 New South Wales Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992) 28 NSWLR 68 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (1987) 9 NSWLR 310, 365 Martin v Tasmania Development and Resources [1999] FCA 593; 89 IR 98, 120-121 Czarnikow Ltd v Koufos [1969] 1 AC 350, 385
PARTIES: Stephen Mayers (Plaintiff) Next Contact Pty Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S): 5582 of 2005
COUNSEL: Mr R. Royle (Plaintiff) Mr M. Easton (Defendant)
SOLICITORS: Home Wilkinson Lowry (Plaintiff) Thomson Playford (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate