NSW Caselaw
New South Wales District Court
CITATION: R v Peter James DAY [3] [2009] NSWDC 359
HEARING DATE(S): 12 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 June 2009
JURISDICTION: District Court Criminal
JUDGMENT OF: Berman SC DCJ
DECISION: The offender is sentenced to imprisonment. I set a non parole period for one year to date from 20 November 2009, and a total term of two years. The offender's non parole period will expire on 19 November 2010, on which day the offender is to be released to parole.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL Law - Sentence - Breaking and entering in company with intent to commit a serious indictable offence
PARTIES: The Crown Peter James Day
FILE NUMBER(S): 07/21/3387
COUNSEL: E. Balodis - Crown P. King - Offender
SOLICITORS: Director of Public Prosecutions Matouk Joyner Lawyers - Offender
SENTENCE
1 HIS HONOUR: On 20 May 2009, after a four week trial, the offender was convicted of an offence of breaking and entering in company with the intent to commit a serious indictable offence, namely to intimidate a man by the name of SA. At the same time the jury found the offender not guilty of a more serious charge, namely breaking and entering in company with intent to kidnap a woman by the name of RM, she was at the time SA's wife.
2 The offender had been involved in the running of mobile telephone stores for some time. It is through that occupation that he met RM and then SA.
3 The offender suffers from a condition called dyspraxia which interferes with his ability to speak and comprehend. He has had very few friends in his life, and was a person who could be easily manipulated by others who preferred their interests over his. RM was one such person.
4 She came into his life when she met the offender after being employed by him at one of his stores. They became friends and RM began to require, as part of her friendship with the offender, that the offender would assist her with problems she was having with her family. Perhaps because of the offender's difficulties in making friends he did what RM required. He helped her to leave her family home on two occasions when RM expressed a desire to run away.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate